In today's world, private companies rather than government pay for and conduct most scientific research. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
The new development of science and technology play an important role in the growing of private company. In the past, that type of research are mainly funded and done by government's agencies. However, more and more private companies concern about Research and Development perspective and they bring out many studies every years. Some people claim that it would be better if private companies together with government's institute have done the exploration. Others thing the opposite. From my point of view, private companies should pay more and carry out more scientific research.
Firstly, private companies can apply well the research they have done in their production process due to the specific properties of experiments. The private companies need advance technology to upgrade their product quality to against their competitors. Meaning, they are directly benefit from that payment in money and time for that R&D processing.
For example, Space X is a private company in aerospace manufacturing and space transportation. They have develop the reusable rockets that can lower the cost more than a half if they not apply that technology. More and more orders are made and the company value grow fast. Secondly, private companies have better human resources in more motivated environment. Their employers are not required to have extremely high degrees such as doctorate to work in R&D department which is needed if people want to work in government's academy. Less time to train and more focus in specific era make people do not feel stress when they learn to be a researchers. Last but not least, private companies invest in technology advancement will cut down the pay from taxes from government. It will help people pay less tax and government have more money to develop the society constructions such as transportation, hospital and school.
On the other hand, government still need to pay for scientific research, especially research which need a large scale of resources in society, health and sustainable development. For instance, US pays more than 8 billion dollars in protecting environment and wild-life. Moreover, private companies usually make their research to be exclusive which makes the study area is wide but not deep enough due to the investment of private companies are limited. This matter will not bring out the highest percentage of values and it can be wasting money if they orientate to incorrect way of development.
In conclusion, the need in development of scientific subjects by government is still important. The assisting in research between private companies and government's institutes is more critical in the world of high-tech companies leading the game. This will create the win-win result in every perspectives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-16 | Pham Van Nhan | 67 | view |
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 80
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020
- Write about the fossil fuels and their alternatives 84
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'developed'.
Suggestion: developed
...ing and space transportation. They have develop the reusable rockets that can lower the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a researcher' or simply 'researchers'?
Suggestion: a researcher; researchers
...o not feel stress when they learn to be a researchers. Last but not least, private companies ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2316.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 437.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29977116705 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9052071387 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50114416476 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 716.4 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4708914804 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2083333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250332853787 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772013796755 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540594433987 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161668686177 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036407791747 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.