Today, TV channels provide men’s sport shows more than women’s sport shows. Why? Should TV channels give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?
During recent years, men’s sport TV programs are dominant in comparison with women’s ones such as football and baseball. This trend can be attributed to a whole of reasons. From my perspective, time broadcasting should be distributed equally for both gender shows. In this essay, the reasons would be discussed and my opinion would be clarified.
There are several reasons why men’s sports shows are dominant. First, the deep-rooted image of women is feminine and inappropriate for competitive activities. In contrast, men whose innateness is masculine and much stronger. In fact, competitions involving men are much more aggressive and dramatic to watch, which captures viewer’s attention. For example, in Vietnam, men’s football events are preferred by the media and men footballers receive higher salaries than female players do. Therefore, due to high ratings, TV producers choose men to appear frequently in their sports channels.
However, this trend should not continue due to a number of reasons. First, since the dominance of men’s sport TV shows leads to the deficient attention of women’s ones, the salary gap would be widened between both genders. Also, the image of a woman who participates in physical activities is not supported by the public eye, which has a negative impact on young girls' viewpoints. Girls would limit their career options in comparison with boys. Therefore, equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport could contribute to gender equality.
In conclusion, they are benefits such as these which urges the TV broadcaster to produce men’s TV shows. Additionally, this imbalance should not be maintained due to gender inequality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | ngoc071003 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42748091603 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88660667673 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591603053435 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2959926596 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6470588235 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4117647059 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398168164871 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122642917489 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127748112258 0.0667982634062 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234069799712 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924095858274 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.