Today, TV channels show more men’s sports than women’s sports. Why is this the case? Should TV channels give equal time for women’s sports and men’s sports.
These days, there is a significant distinctive difference between men and women’s sports coverage on television. To my personal point of view, the equality of time-accounting for both should be a further, more crucial for the current world. The reason will be obviously outlined in the following essay.
To begin with, there are many reasons for the dominance of men sports programs on television. Owing to a massive proportion of sports viewers being male, television channels tend to broadcast male-favoring materials to maximize their ratings and profits. Take football as an example. Inside a coffee shop, there is no doubt that the popularity of a recent well-known football match spreads throughout the men’s discussion of all ages, while women show a greater preference for reviewing other topics such as fashion or celebrity gossip. Additionally, because of the fact that men possess strength and faster than almost ordinary women, they are involved in complex, challenging sports, enhance to play at a much higher level, which is successfully to become spectator attraction due to enthusiasm and ambition.
Nevertheless, I am of the opinion that it is necessary for television channels to provide equal sports coverage of both genders. Firstly, it will be succeeded in motivating the establishment of gender equality in society and increase the quantity of sports-participating women. Every time woman goes out onto the field, she gives it her all knowing that her best will likely go unnoticed. Therefore, just like a standard male athlete, she should receive the completely recognition for her attempt. Secondly, better media coverage also enables women to make money form endorsements which offers them opportunities to have an advance on earnings. That is to say, more balance in time-separating on coverage will result in the vast majority of dealing with endorses and higher salaries in the future through advertising contracts.
In conclusion, why women’s sports shows do not possess the honorable position this day and age as men’s results from the aforementioned reasons. I truly believe that it is necessary to ensure equal coverage of women’s sports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-29 | Bao Tram Vo | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-21 | phamlehuuhiep27 | 89 | view |
- In today s world private companies rather than the government pay for and conduct most scientific research Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- Today TV channels show more men s sports than women s sports Why is this the case Should TV channels give equal time for women s sports and men s sports 89
- The table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 551, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...hion or celebrity gossip. Additionally, because of the fact that men possess strength and faster than al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3918128655 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09384360742 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637426900585 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1881064832 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381393752338 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108852452919 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834182591996 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231995030053 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277153011931 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.