In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
The theme of science and arts has always been a crucial point for the majority of people. Presently, not only do we live in technological era, but also we still treasure any kinds of art. In this essay, I will try to highlight what artists can reveal about life that high-tech world cannot.
There are a number of possible ways to distinguish art and technology, one of the core arguments, that I would like to make is that art can always be a method of expression, which is virtually for everybody. One can effortlessly grasp a simple reasoning behind it: in art people do not need mental efforts, which, obviously, are required for science. Possibly exciting or interesting as science or technology are, they are not accessible for everybody. Nobody can deny that science demands years upon years of formal education. For instance, you need to spend at least 15 years to be an engineer (from the beginning at school to bachelor degree at university). By contrast, to make music, a book or any other kind of art, inspiration and patience are all you need to make a masterpiece.
Another aspect to be mentioned is that art can provide people to enhance imagination. It is obvious to say that if he or she tries to be good at music or painting, they will be also become well-rounded. The most reliable point in it that art people help society to foster creative skills for people, create motivation for them. Our history has a huge number of writers, who helped people to become scientists. For instance, a lot of scientists inspirited by Jules Verne who wrote books about technic apparatuses. Young persons who had read it tried to make their own technique which provided a good start at science way for them.
Taking everything into account it must be said that art, science and technology are linked together. Moreover, sometimes any kind of art can be even more crucial since it can provide more well-educated people for our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | Anoopben | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Mario Nese | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | TOANTRAN | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | huynhhongtram | 60 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | lamnhathuy | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 56
- The Environment is in great danger from Mankind In your opinion what can be done to deal with the enviromental issues we face today 87
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 56
- Films and games can be accessed at any time from mobile devices like smartphones tablets and laptop computers Do the advantages of such development outweigh the disadvantages 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t for the majority of people. Presently, not only do we live in technological era...
^^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o we live in technological era, but also we still treasure any kinds of art. In t...
^^
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...light what artists can reveal about life that high-tech world cannot. There are ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, well, at least, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75074183976 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73235607275 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578635014837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7088525015 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1764705882 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209096519053 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725662962742 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528319482963 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152797290707 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806813332182 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.