Topic: Employers should give their staff at least a 4-week holiday a year to make employees better at their jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that employees should be offered a holiday in 4 weeks each year which help improve their performance at work. Personally, I agree with this statement due to their previous progress for their organisations and the opportunity for people to cooperate with each other.
Firstly, a long-term holiday is essential for every person to relieve his/her work overload. Because they have been working very hard during a year, so they deserve having a break. If the directors just force their staffs to labour in a long time, the staffs have to suffer from stress and this may discredit their working quality as well. Take an example in some organisations in Vietnam, many employers have put too much pressure on their workers and long-term holidays are not allowed in their company. Consequently, most of the members went on strike for several weeks, leading to a downturn in the business’s income. Obviously, holidays definitely reduce the employees’ strain and guarantees the run of the whole business.
Secondly, long-lasting vacations are also ideal occasions for members of the workforce to improve their relationships and learn from each other. For instance, many large businesses, these days, usually organize many long-term trips as a gift for the dedication of the people in the company. Thanks to these vacations, individuals can get to know about each other and share their working experiences so that they can together come up with many good ideas for strategies of the company. As a result, the development of organisations become more sustainable. Plainly, managers should give their personnel enduring holidays every year.
In conclusion, long-lasting breaks are necessary for members of the organisation owing to the relaxation for individuals and their collaboration.
- Test 1 - Cambridge IELTS 10 11
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 61
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 84
- Topic Nowadays celebrities increasingly have the status of role models in particular for younger people Do you see this as a positive or negative development 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to have'.
Suggestion: to have
...ery hard during a year, so they deserve having a break. If the directors just force th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as for, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36971830986 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0213709314 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598591549296 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4614622671 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.928571429 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215320129482 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821643763519 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846722331221 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139145202687 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744564983703 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.