Tourism has negative environmental impacts on tourist areas.
What are these impacts? How can damaging impacts be lessened?
People have been always trying to explore new spaces and develop original directions in tourism. An opinion exists that consequences of travelling affect sightseers spaces and damage it. This essay will discuss the main effects associated with natural issues and propose some possible solutions to handle this issue.
In my opinion, the main effects are considered to be natural contamination and depletion of local nature resources. People pollutes milieu in different ways such as rubbish, noise deterioration and fuel pollution. For example, according to the recently published survey in Meduza, Moscow became the most polluted city since tourism development has expanded. Unlimited usage of resources and excessive building needed by tourism industry could destroy natural habitats and even may result in the extinction of many animals and plants. For instance, hotels for sightseers are building more and more every year in order to accommodate them. Thus, need for protection is increasing due to increased number of vehicles, higher levels of noise, deforestation.
I consider that the best solutions to these problems are creation of protected zones and introducing new laws. Conservation areas support state of the environment in uninterrupted form and protect it against influence of visitors. For example, Croatia is a country with many national parks and appropriately, nature is well preserved. New regulation of some socially compelling complications regarded to be meaningful maintenance in extension ecological milieu. Hence, some measures to improve the situation can save the whole world from catastrophe.
In conclusion, problems with touristic impacts are becoming more significant due to pollution by travellers and exhaustion of nonrenewable sources. The negative environmental impacts of tourism are substantial although humans ought to create ways of protection as wildfire refuges and new legislation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-27 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 92 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | Vasilii | 87 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | Vasilii | 74 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 67 | view |
- Technology provides us a lot of means to communicate But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in a wider variety of methods our communication and social abilities have taken a step back Why does technological advance hurt nontechnical co 89
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 78
- Sometimes spouses have to live far away from each other Maintaining a long distance relationship is sometimes difficult and straining What do you think are the main reasons for long distance relationships What can be done to help couples feel closer 89
- In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one’s own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82042253521 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14610459335 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665492957746 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1674887801 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150174101992 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416085691807 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576542478254 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952298501784 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927764661971 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.