By the era of Technologies people have been more involving in scientific process and as a result they forget many useful traditions such as having meals with their family members together. This negatively affects as family institution as social welfare. Due to it, the main reasons and impacts of the above-mentioned changes will be described in this essay.
As we can witness, nowadays Young employable Generation are too hectic to waste their time on showing their culinary skills. Most of them work during and night or even twenty-four-seven, and due to it they constantly resort to prepared meals, carefully made by high-demand fast food industry. It is obvious why we do not have warm evenings or lunches at home amid our loved ones, because we lost the necessity of doing it. The counters in the shops of supermarkets are displaying a wide range of a ready-to-eat food, so many of us are not fussy eaters and we do not think much time to have a food choice. For example, for tired employers, who are seeking for food each evening after job, the most famous fast-food networks, like McDonald’s or Burger King, are always open. in addition, people become more individualistic and prefer to be alone at least when they have meal. The second reason is total gadgets implementation in our lifestyle, even while individuals eat they look at their smartphones or tablets.
These reasons are seriously harmful firstly, for families, secondly for social future, because children in such families, where parents are always busy, get used to utilize same habits. As a result, in such families relatives do not have warm interactions as it would be in family where each evening all members sit and eat tasty dinners and made with love. The unity absence can lead to the relationship break-up into families which usually уxpresses in divorcement or estrangement. Therefore, there are an increasing amount of lonely hearts and miserable people, who have problems with their health and personality. Because of lack of love come on support and courtship.
In conclusion, it would be Better If People started to change their hectic lifestyle and tried to build warm communication at least in their families by Revival the old tradition to eat meal together minimum once in a day.
- The bar chart below shows the main reasons for students choosing to study at a particular university in the UK in 1985 and 2005 40
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 78
- The line chart shows average attendance at the cinema among various age groups in the US from 2000 to 2011 84
- Average House Prices 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDiscuss both the 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing and night or even twenty-four-seven, and due to it they constantly resort to ...
^^
Line 2, column 779, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...apos;s or Burger King, are always open. in addition, people become more individual...
^^
Line 2, column 907, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gadgets'' or 'gadget's'?
Suggestion: gadgets'; gadget's
...y have meal. The second reason is total gadgets implementation in our lifestyle, even w...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...ent. Therefore, there are an increasing amount of lonely hearts and miserable people, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01583113456 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89389743037 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598944591029 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9005411298 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6875 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164613528919 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520362719683 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526538373238 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122426046645 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534025581909 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.