Traditional education versus online education: which one is better?
In this day and age, technology seems to be part and parcel of education, in which opinions diverge on whether traditional classrooms are currently overshadowed by online training. Although some fervently advocate this sentiment, I am at loggerheads owing to a myriad of rational reasons.
Admittedly, a traditional classroom offers learners an effective environment to absorb knowledge. This can be explained that a teacher, in the process of giving a lecture, shows their wide array of facial expressions in conjunction with body language attracting listeners, which “the machines” as a computer can not perform. As a result, the more exciting the studying time is, the higher concentrated students are, which is in proportion to the higher probability of acquiring the knowledge.
Further and even more prominently, attending classes in person refines students’ numerous necessary skills. To be more accurate, through face-to-face working with teachers and other classmates, pupils can improve both communication and teamwork skills which are of paramount importance to not only their future career path but also their daily life. Meanwhile, a haemorrhage in cooperation skills of students is attributed to sitting in front of a computer during the online courses.
Last but not least, participants’ age ranges and subjects are not the hurdles of traditional education while the reverse is true for internet-based platforms. First, e-learning is not suitable for all-aged learners. When the covid-19 pandemic transpires, which obligates the young children to stay home instead of going to schools, most of them can not concentrate on the lesson as well as operate machines to study online without parental support and supervision. Second, online education is less effective than traditional one, particularly in the practical fields. Subjects, for example, like arts and sports require direct observation and correction from the teacher, which a computer can not offer.
By way of conclusion, notwithstanding the benefits of online education, I ascertain that on no account can a traditional teaching method be substituted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | nguyennhathuy | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | nguyennhathuy | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-13 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | Sandeep USA | 73 | view |
- The picture shows the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows how beer is produced 61
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below gives information about daily salt intake in the USA in 2000 61
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62229102167 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21070096345 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625386996904 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7740064539 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224375964424 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710266574702 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829487157568 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106600418451 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699518600822 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.