Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Does advantage outweigh the disadvantages?

It is true that nowadays, the traffic congestion and housing crisis are becoming increasingly serious. Personally, I totally agree with the idea that the governments should force some major businesses to move to the deprived areas.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why many company owners are likely to locate their company in the large metropolis. Firstly, these areas have a large number population, so they can easily employ the best employment for each vacancy positions that impossible to do in the countryside. Secondly, the cities often already have a very good transport network such as arterial roads and huge ports. As a result, the companies can save a great deal of money spend on haulage.
On the other hand, I do think that moving major businesses to rural counterparts is a better option. These days, the exhaust fumes from vehicles and gas emissions from factories are directly leading to global warming, which may have a devastating effect on the future of cities. Air pollution can have some health problems for citizens like cancers and respiratory diseases. By migrating those big businesses to rural areas, it can foster the local economy. An economic progress will have help local residents improve the quality of life. At the same time, the property prices in the cities will dramatically decrease which allows people to afford their housing.
For the reasons mentioned above, I believe that if some businesses are moved out the cities, it can enhance city life for average inhabitants.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.104 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64174487792 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8598665089 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1538461538 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212248293837 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678863512945 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674717438842 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134709453479 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833118291196 0.056905535591 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.