These days, traffic and housing are rising problems in many big cities. To solve these problems, it is thought that large companies, factories, and their workers should be moved to rural areas. I am of the opinion that totally supports the given idea.
First, if the workers are moved to the countryside, the traffic congestion could be solved in the rush hours due to the decrease in the number of people traveling to work. To explain, the traffic congestion stems from the large number of vehicles traveling on the road that may overload existing roads and transit systems daily. Hence, when some people leave the city to the rural area for work, there are fewer people residing in big cities and fewer vehicles on urban roads. As a result, it seems that there is less traffic congestion in the urban area.
Moreover, due to the fewer number of urban citizens when numerous workers come to live in rural areas, residing in many big cities could become easier. To explain, when there is overpopulation in megacities, the price of renting an apartment or buying a house is rising significantly so various inhabitants cannot afford to rent an apartment. Those people, in likelihood, accept living in tight slums where the air may smell foul and the living may be inconvenient. However, if there are fewer urban citizens, the housing prices may decrease, so some inhabitants can have more favorable accommodation.
To conclude, large companies, factories, and their employees should relocate to rural areas to solve the traffic and housing problems in the cities.
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 61
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- There is a trend of increasing competitiveness in today s society In your opinion is it a good or a bad development 73
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01149425287 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62817934485 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4555833255 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214692338883 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846651499612 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874859340961 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166286160854 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893951391883 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.