Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that the relocation of firms and their workers to the countryside can be helpful in tackling traffic and housing issues. In my opinion, I completely agree with this idea because of several reasons which will be explained in this essay.
To begin with, moving companies and their employees to rural areas can be effective in solving traffic problems. Firstly, because a large number of workers move to the countryside, the quantity of vehicles moving during rush hours is declined, which leads to the decrease of traffic congestion in the cities. As a result, people can spend less time commuting to work on a daily basis. Secondly, this trend could help to maintain the quality of roads. Consequently, the government do not need to invest much money in repairing infrastructure. If big businesses are located in municipalities, their workers’ travelling will make the road be in poor conditions.
At the same time, issues related to accommodation could be addressed when companies and their employees are transferred to the countryside. Due to this transfer, there would be fewer people in the city, which means the shortage of housing can be tackled. For example, homeless or economically disadvantaged people can be equipped with houses. Moreover, houses in rural areas are often cheaper than in the cities, which enables people to afford their own house or apartment. For example, they can purchase a double story house with a garden. If firms are positioned in metropolises, their labourers will need a large amount of money to live in such a comfortable one.
In conclusion, I believe transposing big business, factories and their labourers to the rural areas would reduce traffic congestion and maintain the quality of the roads. Meanwhile, it can also implement the shortage of housing and make it easier for residents to afford a place to live.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | hieu13092006 | 52 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
- Some people prefer to live in small family units while others think it is better to live in large family groups Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The media should include more stories which report good news To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that news has no connection with people s lives so it is a waste of time to read newspapers and watch television news programmes To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to these places historical attractions 78
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ving traffic problems. Firstly, because a large number of workers move to the countryside, the qu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11074918567 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92140465217 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540716612378 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1062219397 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313798059338 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941919063593 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741377986751 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180356101779 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541687013235 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ving traffic problems. Firstly, because a large number of workers move to the countryside, the qu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11074918567 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92140465217 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540716612378 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1062219397 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313798059338 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941919063593 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741377986751 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180356101779 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541687013235 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.