Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree?
These days, it is undeniable that traffic congestion and the lack of accommodation have become a heated issue to residents in big cities. Regarding this, many people opinionated that by relocating large entrepreneurs, factories and their staff to the rural areas, the aforementioned problems can be addressed. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this viewpoint due to the high cost and the risk of damaging the rural environment.
To commence with, the act of moving companies, industrial areas and the whole staff to the countryside will require a large amount of money. It is because the business not only has to pour money into the relocation process, but also has to invest in the erection of supporting facilities such as roads, railways, power plants, and gas stations. Moreover, since the employees also move to a new place, there is a likelihood that new residential infrastructures also have to be built, including schools, hospitals and so on. As a result, this practice may lead to a great burden on the budget of the enterprises, while the resulting profits may not be able to make up for the invested amount of money.
Furthermore, the relocation of such big companies, factories and people is likely to result in the degradation of the rural environment. This is due to the fact that to make way for new buildings to be constructed, such rural surroundings as big trees, lakes and fields have to be removed. As a result, the natural beauty and peace of the countryside is likely to be seriously spoiled. Moreover, the appearance of new factories and households is attributed to an increase in carbon dioxide and wastage, which leads to worse air and water pollution in rural areas.
To conclude, I am against the idea of moving enterprises, factories and their employees from big cities to the countryside since this may raise the problems of inadequate budget and the deterioration of the rural environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | hieu13092006 | 52 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
- The graph below show relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- Some people say that healthcare should not be provided for free regardless of a person s income The health of a person is in their own hands and they should therefore be held accountable for that To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries around the world men and women are having babies late in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Multi cultural societies in which there is a mixture of different ethnic people bring more benefits than drawbacks to a country To what extent do you agree 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, as to, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99690402477 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04471495896 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520123839009 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.472513205 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193008119223 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699547254412 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549800843575 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125433730325 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037512195135 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.