Traffic and housing problems in major cities can be solved by moving large companies,
factories and their employees to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Nowadays, congestion and housing problem in big cities is one of the most serious dilemmas that governments have to face and cope with. I agree with the view that the best solution for this problem is transferring large companies, manufactures and their staffs to the rural areas.
First, it is obvious that in order to facilitate the commute process, citizens tend to choose their houses near their workplaces. Moving companies to countryside where having a lot of available lands and wide roads will lead to the consequences of relocation of employees, leading to reduce the number of transportations and housing demands in cities. For example, a factory moved from city to countryside will lead to the result of thousands of its staffs relocating their homes next to factory. This means less thousands of transportation and available houses and residents in city.
Moreover, establishing new companies and factories in rural area will attract investments from governments and business corporations on building infrastructure and housing for citizens. In the results, affordable housing price and convenience public facilities will be emerged in countryside, attracting citizens from cities to rural area to enjoy the comfortable life. Therefore, help to diminish the population density in cities and solve the congestion and housing issues in big cities.
It is also true that not all clerks will move their homes following to their work’s location. They might insist to live at central cities and take a long commute distance to work. But those people are few.
In sum, relocation of companies and factories to countryside is a comprehended method to deal with congestion and extravagant housing price in central cities. It is not only beneficial for individuals who live and work at rural areas, but also for corporations and government as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | Spring2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Spring2019 | 61 | view |
- Figures show that in some countries, there is an ever-increasing proportion of populationaged 15 or younger. What do you think the effect of current and future in those countries? 11
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred. 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types ofeducational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant 73
- Economic growth in in recent years made some people in both developed countries anddeveloping countries richer. However, research showing that while people in developingcountries are happier, people in developed countries seems no happier than before. Why 73
- More and more people buy a wide range of household goods like television microwave oven and rice cooker Do you think this is positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... is obvious that in order to facilitate the commute process, citizens tend to choose their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will lead to the result of thousands of its staffs relocating their homes next t...
^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun thousands is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...their homes next to factory. This means less thousands of transportation and availab...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32881355932 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03270689607 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545762711864 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3506782918 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215825136277 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717937252374 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445372503642 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113763795767 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466839690784 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.