The treat of nuclear power weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.
The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
In current contemporary society, nuclear weapons play a momentous role in holding the world’s peace and providing humans with energy that lights up millions of individual’s homes. Hence, a group of individuals claims that nuclear technologies far outweigh the disadvantages. From my perspective, I opine that they have a substantial impact on the human race. The further paragraphs will discuss both causes and give the opinion on the issue above.
On the one hand, nuclear technologies have increased the development of the military and scientific industries. Moreover, they also play an important role in leading the world to the 4.0 Industrial era. For instance, nuclear reactors not only provide millions of gigawatts for citizens every minute but also help chemists to do research about the reaction of these particles. Thus, the majority of developed countries are using these technologies to stabilize the economy during the current pandemic and maintain the country’s military forces on the international arena.
On the other hand, despite the benefits that they bring to the technological industries, several governments that nuclear energy and weapons still face many protests from environmentalists. In general, only a minuscule amount of Uranium remains in the continent due to the demand for materials used for nuclear weapons are increasing day by day. Furthermore, in the current world situation, super nations tend to use these weapons to cause conflict in sensitive areas. Hence, although these weapons prevent the continuation of world war one, they also could cause nuclear war in the future
In conclusion, nuclear technologies are making a negative impact on inhabitants’ living environment. Governments and people should minimize their dependence on nuclear energy otherwise in the near future the world will face a variety of conflict and radioactive pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | ÁNH HANDSOME | view | |
| 2022-09-16 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | Luisjackiet | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | tungpham | 73 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56055363322 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08797891795 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57785467128 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5148700535 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.615384615 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292207940522 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100457682547 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711145409484 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178143928462 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235572610381 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56055363322 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08797891795 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57785467128 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5148700535 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.615384615 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292207940522 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100457682547 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711145409484 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178143928462 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235572610381 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.