It is a common belief that Universities and Colleges should give a fair enrolment opportunity to both male and female students in every class. Personally, I do agree that this procedure bolsters gender equality along with studying productivity to some extent. However, it is almost unrealistic and difficult for universities as well as students to apply.
On the positive side, the same quantity of boys and girls in every classroom at universities gives students equal chances to improve and dedicate themselves. Nowadays, gender equality is one of the most noticeable topics around the world especially in classrooms, therefore, students could feel more confident and comfortable studying in such an environment. Furthermore, each gender has its own potentials and the combination of these prospects is always better. A typical example of this is the case of a law lesson where students usually assemble to find solutions for a lawsuit. That said boys often have more critical and logical thinking which helps them reach a precise judgement, meanwhile, girls are more likely to approach ethical manners and provide reasonable decisions.
Nevertheless, it is impossible for any universities or tertiary institutions to enrol the same numbers of men and women in every subject due to personal preference. That said boys are prone to apply for male-nominated subjects such as technology or military training whereas girls tend to study arts or psychology. Besides, students could be distracted because of the other gender, for example, they might easily be in a romantic relationship with a boy or girl studying the same subjects and neglect school works.
In conclusion, there are considerable advantages including gender equality and productivity if universities allow an equal quantity of boys and girls in all subjects. However, there are also some obstacles such as gender tendency and loss of concentration in classrooms.
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should s
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 73
- The young today spend a large amount of their leisure time in shopping centres It is feared that this could have a negative influence on the young and society To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43189368771 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08341445968 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601328903654 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5765793076 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.769230769 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243628830492 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827493032961 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693548510298 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152817424657 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944129870757 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.