Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The capacity of the universities to accept students should be divided between males and females accurately. I strongly disagree
Because of the difference in the population of males and females, the number of participants would be varied among males and females. To begin with, the population of males and females are not equivalent. According to the distinction in their population, the number of participants would be different in gender. Because of the difference in the population of males and females, the number of participants would be varied among males and females. For instance, the population of girls in Ukraine is much bigger than boys and it would be injustice to consider the same capacity for girls for university’s positions.
.
In addition, male students have higher propensity for some specific majors which it totally different from female’s tendencies. In this regard, boys would unlikely get interested in the capacity which is designated to them in some majors, beside they would hardly compete for limited opportunities they have in some other majors. For example, mining engineering has generally higher demand among males than females and usually the number of girls in the class is not comparable with boys.
This suggestion also could deviate us from our goals. The first priority of each society should be the development. For achieving this goal, the universities should bring somebody up who are capable to lead the society to the more developed status. Hence, they should pick more potential students regardless their gender.
In conclusion, there are many reasons why this suggestion is not endorsed. It would engender injustice among adolescent who are trying to continue their education and pursue their career goals and even retard the process of development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | yomost232131 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | hien2422006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | lee giang | 73 | view |
- nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 67
- today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 67
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... females accurately. I strongly disagree Because of the difference in the populat...
^^^
Line 2, column 615, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y for girls for university’s positions. . In addition, male students have highe...
^^
Line 6, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...regardless their gender. In conclusion, there are many reasons why this suggesti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35563380282 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85684719044 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492957746479 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8546082717 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183941289159 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07484974023 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745566485942 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124151403929 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10724493207 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.