Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every
subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued whether the idea of accepting equal proportions of each gender should be applied to every university subject. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this view.
To begin with, it seem to be impractical to have the same number of men and women on all degree courses. The number of students depend on how many applications the institution receives and their student quotas. If a university decided to fill courses with equal numbers of male and female, it would need enough applicants of each gender. Furthermore, there are many subjects that are mainly for one sexuality than the other. This might be explained by the fact that IT courses tend to attract more men students. If the universities ask for the same percentage for each gender, they might never meet the aim.
There is stronger reason to argue that it would be unfair to base admission to university courses on gender since it is about the quality, not the quantity. The principle goal is to choose the best candidates for each subject according to their qualifications. In this way, students could have a high-quality education system with equal opportunities for all. If a female student is the most suitable one for a place on a course, then it is surely wrong to reject her in favour of a male student with lower grades or fewer qualifications.
In conclusion, the admission of university students should be based on merit, and it would be both unrealistic and unfair to change to a selection procedure based on gender.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | yomost232131 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | hien2422006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | lee giang | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...ee with this view. To begin with, it seem to be impractical to have the same numb...
^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: IN_PRINCIPAL[3]
Message: Did you mean 'principal' (=main)?
Suggestion: principal
...bout the quality, not the quantity. The principle goal is to choose the best candidates f...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, then, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88030888031 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8355649764 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548262548263 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2233784656 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2307692308 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230565262323 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792487630774 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625867251017 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148964985467 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523233460401 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.