Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Equality between men and women has become a matter of controversy since women started defending their right. According to some, university education is not exception and has to provide the equal opportunities in any fields of study. Yet, in some majors, it is better to be selective in choosing male or female students.
Acknowledging the same number of men and women who have chosen the same majors does not mean that women are as practical as men in those fields. Mining, for instance, is considered to be masculine and because of that many universities literally tend not to express gendered solidarity and act discriminatory. The ensuing justification can be related to the future job market in which men can tolerate the harsh atmosphere and conditions better than their female counterparts. Women are usually thought to be physically weaker and emotionally more vulnerable than men; as a result, it is assumed that women would eventually resign; it is more logical to select men to study this major at the beginning. On the contrary, in some majors including those linked to health issues or mentality of individuals women show better sympathy and empathy and can be more patient as well as responsible, so, the government budget should be allocated to train a large proportion of them to finish their education and join the market.
Another point to mention is that the tendency of men to have a long-term job or work full time can be more than women’s as women usually resign after having a child or when they are expecting their child. Hence, if the companies hire the equal number of men and women, they may face company downsize or resignation when women set their priority over meeting their family’s needs or when they cannot juggle between home and work’s responsibilities. Not only can the financial outcomes of a company be at risk, but also future career structure or prospect can be challenged due to incomplete projects or lack of experts or trained forces. In other words, the more men graduate, the more forces the organizations can recruit.
In conclusion, although it is not fair to choose more male students in universities, in some cases, male can be better candidates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-01 | AliJamali | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | essay-english | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | essay-english | 78 | view |
| 2015-12-06 | ielts.webster | 70 | view |
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- it is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction do you agree or disagree what sorts of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... of men to have a long-term job or work full time can be more than women’s as women usual...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t risk, but also future career structure or prospect can be challenged due to inc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in other words, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9783197832 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86522285113 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550135501355 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.5181502833 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.307692308 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3846153846 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0729639481315 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350754001437 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033777154833 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682312704314 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397055136834 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.