University should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is noticeable that more male students choose physics, maths as their majors than female students, while most girls prefer history and laws. This can be explained by their performance in those subjects and their interest. Therefore, university should not accept equal numbers of male and female students in all subjects.
To begin with, boys can be better at some subjects than girls. Although it is true that everyone was born with the same brain system, the way they think when confronting difficulties can be quite different. Girls are emotional, whereas boys tend to use reasons to make accurate explanations. For example, it has been surveyed that male students can solve the math problem more quickly than female students though they acquire the same knowledge and are given the same assignments every day. It is because boys are more capable of utilizing math theories and more sensitive to figures. Another example can be seen in physics. With plenty of mathematical equations, the movement of a ball can be described as inaccessible. To calculate the speed of the ball and predict the route requires the understanding of all physical formulas with many variables, which can be extremely hard for most girls.
Besides, fewer girls study some subjects than boys, and consequently it is unfair for university to reduce the number of male students for the sake of balancing students in two sex categories. For example, only a few girls attend subjects like structural mechanics, while there are usually more than one hundred boys learning those subjects. If university only accept the same number of males as females, the total number will decrease dramatically with only ten boys and ten girls. As a result, those boys have to unwillingly change their subjects into others they dislike, such as laws and marketing.
In conclusion, while equal numbers of boys and girls seemingly indicate that the university attaches equal importance to admissions regardless of their gender, this measure will result in a lot of students being forced to choose subjects they are not interested in and will jeopardize the whole education system of a major.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Narges.s | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Moaz | 67 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. 61
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the projec 3
- University should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby 72
- All parents should be required to volunteer their time to their children's schools. 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1452991453 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68830254255 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529914529915 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8658378353 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212094112382 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768121755948 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10642299437 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157116609396 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746847291761 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.