The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile should be banned like smoking. To what extend do agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile should be banned like smoking. To what extend do agree or disagree?

It is suggested that the use of mobile phones should be banned just like smoking in all indoor places. Personally, I disagree with this opinion, because I think that although in certain occasions using mobiles will cause disturbance and disrespect to other people, banning its use like smoking is unreasonable.

On the one hand, I admit that using mobile phones in certain places may cause some problems. When people are engaging in their study in the library either reading journal articles to look for research ideas or examining opposing views from different scholars, it is often annoying to be disturbed by constant ring tone or message notifications. Apart from that, browsing websites or watching video through phones during class is disrespectful for both the teachers and the classmates, as the sound may interrupt teachers’ train of thought and influence other students’ learning efficiency in class.

However, on the other hand, I believe that there are two reasons why mobile phones should not be banned like smoking. Firstly, the difference between these two is particularly clear. Playing mobile phones does not pose negative effects on others all the time like smoking does. It is harmless to use phones in one’s leisure time for entertaining purposes such as texting with their partner or playing games. Secondly, it is necessary for many people to use their phones indoor constantly. Executive assistant of a senior manager, for example, needs to check his or her phone constantly to make sure they can meet the needs of the boss spontaneously.

In conclusion, I admit that using phones in certain occasions is annoying for other people, but banning it like smoking is not reasonable because the use of phone in many other occasions can do no harm and even can be necessary.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-10 nieyuan 73 view
Essays by user nieyuan :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, apart from, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16271186441 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78864608175 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569491525424 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.603418717 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.916666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353162877198 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143692109166 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129232557302 0.0667982634062 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232043660017 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103077920268 0.056905535591 181% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.