People change their career and place of residence several times during life. Is it a positive or negative development?
In the past, people used to work in the same job for a lifetime and live in the same place from birth to death. Today, however, job hopping and home moving have become much more frequent. From my point of view, both individuals and society benefit from such development.
From an individual perspective, hopping from one job to another can be highly rewarding. More specifically, if people change jobs often, then they are always challenged with a lot to learn, making their learning curve stay high. With more professional expertise and work experience comes better salary. When it comes to moving to live in a new city or even a new country, people may experience a great deal of fun and exhilaration. For example, a family from London where there is no coastline at all will certainly be amazed by the sea view if they relocate to Southampton. This means that frequent relocation may be really exciting.
From the perspective of the society as a whole, changes in career and residence can also be beneficial. With regard to the former, job hopping increases the intensity of competition in the office. In other words, newcomers with better competence always drive those employees who have been satisfied with themselves to be more engaged and devoted. As for the positive effect on society of frequent moving home, I believe that it stimulates the need for housing and therefore boosts the economy of both places when people leave and arrive.
In conclusion, although some people may argue that frequently changing jobs and residence may be detrimental in terms of job security and social networking stability, I strongly believe that this modern way of living is generally positive to individuals, companies, and communities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-23 | lethianhthu | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Cuvucuucucuuc | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | Lâm Bích Ngọc | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | tuyetnhunng98 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | thanhtu000 | 80 | view |
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile should be banned like smoking. To what extend do agree or disagree? 73
- 1111 11
- Some people think that it is beneficial for children to do paid work while others think that it can be harmful for children What are the advantages and disadvantages of children doing paid work 81
- Some people say that when dividing how taxes should be spent, the government should prioritize health care. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe famous people’s support towards international aid organizations draws the attention to problems, while others think celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, as for, for example, in conclusion, in other words, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04861111111 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79880065529 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1855526495 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121549978951 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400120815122 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511696245169 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802551268866 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312722981051 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.