The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years.
What are the positive and negative effects of this trend?
In contemporary society, we are living in The Fourth Industrial Revolution ( 4 IR), so the use of smartphones is definitely ubiquitous, such a household name. However, a number of people suppose that this issue has a number of benefits and downsides. From my point of view, there are some positive effects, nevertheless, the virtue is gained more than loose from the population of phones, particularly smartphones.
First and foremost, the invention of smartphones was realized as a huge step forward in worldwide technology, and it is still useful nowadays. The applicability of it emerged in every aspect such as in education, schools stimulate their students to use smartphones to research interesting documents or videos which is closely associated with the lessons. For instance, before the 1900s, when humans did not pay attention to the appearance of smartphones, it is undeniable that people were thorny in searching for information because of the big horizon. In addition, the governments spent an amount of money to create several apps and stock exchanges on smartphones to aid understanding and economic growth of the countries.
On the other, albeit with negative effects brought back to people, it seems to be a thought-provoking problem for the leaders to find the answers. The young generation was exposed to smartphones when they were kids. Unexpectedly, they properly searched some articles, movies, and websites banned for a long time without the surveillance of their parents. For example, in the US, a minority of young people, 20 %, commit a crime even while they are just studying because they followed some atrocious advice from online guests.
In conclusion, although smartphones play a crucial role in people’s lives, it should be considered carefully to use. In my opinion, experts in technology enhance modern devices in a positive way and make it become the greatest invention of all time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ving in The Fourth Industrial Revolution 4 IR, so the use of smartphones is defin...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of phones, particularly smartphones. First and foremost, the invention of sma...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and economic growth of the countries. On the other, albeit with negative effec...
^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ts in technology enhance modern devices in a positive way and make it become the greatest inventi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me the greatest invention of all time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, nevertheless, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33660130719 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11197854181 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633986928105 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7591244508 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.615384615 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0780422018492 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0257355554535 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0225487464307 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.046369601178 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153223180069 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.