The use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries and shops To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries and shops. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many a people possesses an idea that using cellphones ought to be prohibited in specific public areas such as libraries and shops. From my perspective, mobile phones may be used to a certain extent that everyone feels comfortable regardless of banning them in case that people need to use their phones to communicate in emergencies or seek something.

Nowadays, cellphones are seen as a necessary device used by humans; therefore, they may use their devices whenever they yearn to do whether or not people surround them, especially in public areas. To be specific,quiet public areas such as libraries are where everyone comes to read and find materials; therefore, these people would like to read and work in a tranquil dimension. However, all phone users’ activities are over control and may get under people who use library skin. Moreover, in recreation areas like shops, cell phones are overused and might adversely affect shoppers’ attitude in that all the shoppers long to indulge themselves in buying and admiring all items in the shops. Hence, cell phones in excess of using may have some avoiding detrimental effect on surrounding people, should the phones not be under control.

On the other hand, communication is a main function of cell phones that people may use to keep in touch with their relatives. If banned, everyone will not have the ability to contact their people in urgent situations. In fact, when turning off the phones in public areas, girls may miss the proposal from their boyfriends; therefore, this would have an impact on their life. Furthermore, if prohibited, the cellphones will not assist its owner in immediately solving blunders in their job. Thus, when all the public places ban all cell phones, this thing might adversely influence not only phone users’ life but also their career.
In conclusion, banning cell phones in public places is an inappropriate method because it may have some negative effect on people’s lives. Governments might enhance the phone users’ cognition of how to use mobile phones in public places.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-02 nguyenkhang 70 view
2021-10-20 buiminhduc 56 view
2021-09-08 KEVA 84 view
2021-09-07 KEVA 84 view
2021-09-07 tamle 78 view
Essays by user TerenceNguyen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...their devices whenever they yearn to do whether or not people surround them, especially in pub...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , quiet
...pecially in public areas. To be specific,quiet public areas such as libraries are wher...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dversely influence not only phone users’ life but also their career. In conclusi...
^^
Line 6, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to use mobile phones in public places.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1449704142 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71689307858 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0868954108 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.214285714 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277562832031 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103809444695 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639655417909 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195927925499 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614986686053 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.