The use of social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact in this century. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
The today’s digital revolution has made traditional conversations be superseded by public network. While not disavowing their drawbacks, I believe that the advantages of social media still dominate.
On the one hand, negative influences exerted by interactive multimedia have been widely recognized in terms of residents’ relationship and health. Firstly, convenient text-messaging features of social media may people prefer online conversations to face-to-face contact, which discourage real interaction. Consequently, not only does this leads to a lack of communication skills but also diminishes the level of understanding and authentic emotion, especially when feelings are expressed by emotional icons rather than gestures. Regarding to health, public network makes people channel more time into using their smartphones or computers. This over-reliance on technological devices encourages a closed and sedentary lifestyle, the major contributing factors to many problems in both terms of physical and mental. That explains why the number of people needing treatments for social media addiction has grown significantly in the UK nowadays.
On the other hand, it seems to me that social media offers a huge number of considerable advantages. Firstly, if public network were not available, it would be impossible for residents to keep in touch through a long distance. Indeed, interactive multimedia with a wide range of conversation tools such as text-messaging or video-conferencing facilitates them keep abreast of others’ situation as well as accomplish multinational cooperation without traveling an extensive journey. Another advantage stems from business, in which once publications about products go viral through posts on social media, this will assist brands with highly economical marketing strategies. In addition, communication tools on public network also motivate e-commerce, which is beneficial for consumer thanks to a shortened shopping duration.
In brief, although its negative impacts should not be overlooked, I believe that social media remains advantageous because of the above outweighing positive ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-01 | dahmuk113 | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-13 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think it has more advantages or disadvantages? 89
- The best way to reduce youth crime is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The graph show the progress of milk production.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Some people say that money can make life easier and more comfortable. But others say that having a great amount of wealth can bring some problems. What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of a having a lot of money? 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lead'?
Suggestion: lead
...ction. Consequently, not only does this leads to a lack of communication skills but a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, may, regarding, so, still, then, well, while, in addition, in brief, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04901960784 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39597836549 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683006535948 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8342733361 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.214285714 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192084821016 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578257646078 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555671195682 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107909475761 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334604569911 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.81 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.