The use of software makes it unnecessary for people to know how to spell words correctly these days.
Do you agree with this statement?
Applications that automatically correct spellings are ubiquitous and heavily integrated into most gadgets. They have such an impact on one’s literacy that it is proposed, thanks to them, knowing how to spell is oblivious. This statement is completely untrue, as will be proved in the following essay.
The popularity of spelling software is undeniable. This stems from the fact that autocorrects are becoming increasingly precise, giving suggestions that are genuinely compatible with the context. Also, as voice input could be transcribed directly into texts, there is less pressure for people to have to check their spellings. However, all of these features are only meant to be supplementary as these apps can only be accessed by smart gadgets, which are not constantly accessible.
The need for knowing how to spell, however, is imperative to our lives. To begin with, numerous activities necessitate handwriting, of which effectiveness is tied to correct spelling. Examples for this are wide-ranging, from writing essays, filling out forms to completing police records or medical notes. Likewise, collecting and comprehending information cannot be achieved without recognizing words and understanding their meanings. For instance, reading specialized articles requires from readers a certain level of familiarity with the terms while listening to news naturally involves the process of distinguishing words that have similar sounds but different meanings. Lastly, it is impossible to divorce spelling from other aspects of a language like grammar and syntax as part of a rigorous approach to literacy.
Stemming from the aforementioned arguments, it is in my conviction that knowing how to spell correctly is still crucial in our lives and albeit useful, spelling software can only facilitate the process instead of gradually eradicating it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-04 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-01 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
- The practice of illegally hunting wild animals continues to cause concern in many countries particularly developing countries What are the causes of such hunting What are the effects on the animals and on the wider human society in these countries and bey 89
- People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction 95
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 56
- In many countries truancy skipping classes is a worrying problem for both parents and educators What are the causes of truancy What may be the effects on the child and the wider community 89
- Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals while others think that it is important to protect some not all of them Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, likewise, so, still, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11888924127 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652329749104 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2109144896 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.928571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272219152081 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850330790592 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433676016844 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154437072049 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138258937805 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.