Very few schoolchildren learn about the value of money and how to look after it yet this is a critical life skill that should be taught as part of the school curriculum Do you agree or disagree Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reaso

Only quite small group of school children knows the value of money and spends wisely. Also, it is a compulsion life skill should be taught to children in their schools. In general, along with most of the peoples, I do strongly agree with the argument.

The most compelling reason that holding my view is that children should be taught the value of money during their schooling. Because, if the students are given more money than required, there is a chance that the student might attract to short term pleasures. They will spend money either in gambling or some other way which is not a legitimate.

Additionally, children will be easily accustomed to easy money and dose not show interest to work hard and earn money in future. For instance, if a child is given pocket money regularly without making he/she to work, they get used to easy money and they depends completely on their parents in future. Sometimes this might result in ending up as a dropout. So in that case it is better to implement a subject that teaches the students in school about the value of money. By this, in future if he or she spends a penny they thinks once or twice about their accountability before spending too much.

To sum up, I do completely agree with the argument that students should be taught the value of money during their schooling. This is because, if the students knows the value of money then in future they do not spend money unnecessarily and end up in worst cases

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...gambling or some other way which is not a legitimate. Additionally, children will be eas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e other way which is not a legitimate. Additionally, children will be easily ac...
^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ow interest to work hard and earn money in future. For instance, if a child is given pock...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'depend'
Suggestion: depend
...k, they get used to easy money and they depends completely on their parents in future. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...hey depends completely on their parents in future. Sometimes this might result in ending ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'think'
Suggestion: think
...future if he or she spends a penny they thinks once or twice about their accountabilit...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the worst'.
Suggestion: in the worst
...ot spend money unnecessarily and end up in worst cases
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, for instance, in general, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64615384615 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.446661776 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526923076923 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2095247334 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9230769231 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193340731676 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810031821745 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517945651795 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137787765229 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319883518174 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.