Water resources around the world are falling deficient Analyse the possible reasons and provide your suggestions

Essay topics:

Water resources around the world are falling deficient. Analyse the possible reasons and provide your suggestions.

It is widely known that access to water is essential to all living creatures on Earth. However, in today's world, countries worldwide are facing different levels of water shortages. There are several reasons which can be cited to be the cause of this trend.
A trigger for this emergence is the lack of knowledge. Many people tend to believe that the amount of water in the world is infinite, given the available supplies in numerous countries. They consider water as an endless resource of energy. Additionally, one of the most prominent justifications for the lack of water is the rise of global population at an alarming rate. This has led to the irresistible demand for water, which is one necessary element for any human being in the world. Moreover, the pollution of human industrialization is yet another incentive for water shortage. Briefly, humans have to take the major responsibility for the water crisis.
Nevertheless, measures are capable of being taken to mitigate the issues mentioned above. One can adopt various approaches, such as rainwater harvest, restoration of ecosystems. New technologies would certainly help lessen water shortages by undertaking pollution and having used water recyclable. Water use could be made more effective in agriculture by introducing new farming techniques, like drip irrigation. Governments are suggested to impose heavy taxes and fines on factories once they continue to harm the freshwater.
Taking everything into account, to reduce water shortages that emanate mainly from overpopulation and pollution, humans could take a number of solutions. By doing so, the Earth is prevented from further deficiency of water resources.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-08-18 Lee Hwa 89 view
2020-08-18 Lee Hwa 89 view
2020-07-28 nmengg 78 view
2018-08-15 ntphuc0101 93 view
Essays by user nmengg :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38257575758 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05147668944 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640151515152 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6147707253 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.5882352941 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175534380591 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546839548275 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361651565188 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988766013533 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200607473448 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.