We are becoming increasingly depended on computers. There are used to in business, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used in the future? Is this dependence on the computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of their benefits?
Most of the population tend to use computers in many aspects of life, computers can be useful or we ought to be careful while using them in the future. In my opinion, hi-tech computers can give advantages for future inventions such as non-driver public transports and robot builders.
On the one hand, creating an automobile with no human driver could benefit not only security but also comfort of people. Current drivers like taxi drivers have not sufficient responsibility for route rules. As a result, a lot of people facing unpredictable consequences such as car accidents. Creation of robot drivers could have reliable features that can protect passengers' lifes instead of risking them. Moreover, robot drivers cannot bother with people and be annoying as some human drivers do. These can give people their comfort zone and relaxation while bringing them to their addresses. This creation might because of people's satisfaction and support of further future techno inventions.
On the other hand, robot builders can save significant amount of time. They cannot get tired as human builders, all we should do is charge their battery on time. They do not get affected by some environmental problem or pandemic such as air pollution and COVID-19. Thus, they can continue their work in spite of these types of issues and make job done much faster. Furthermore, in building sections a great deal of workers face death by accidents like falling from skyscrapers suddenly. Robot builders can be good idea in this case, they may have special functions that make work more reliable compared to ordinary employees. They will not make errors at all, if they do so and get mashed by heavy items, people can fix them whilst neither person, nor technology can return human life.
All in all, computer-based technologies can be safe in transportation as well as defensible in construction.
- Prevention is better than cure Out of a country s health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on have education and preventative measures To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
- We are becoming increasingly depended on computers There are used to in business hospitals crime detection and even to fly planes What things will they be used in the future Is this dependence on the computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious 78
- We are becoming increasingly depended on computers There are used to in business hospitals crime detection and even to fly planes What things will they be used in the future Is this dependence on the computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Most of the population tend to use compu...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... public transports and robot builders. On the one hand, creating an automobile ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of further future techno inventions. On the other hand, robot builders can sa...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nor technology can return human life. All in all, computer-based technologies ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7754917178 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.8297014518 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.5294117647 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160369083342 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494521209316 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730492862679 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117767770612 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084260670175 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.