As we are facing many problems which affect the whole planet, good relationships between different countries are becoming more important than ever before.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is clear that the earth is dealing with plenty of issues these days. Therefore, some people argue that the quality of the relationship that nations possess between each other is playing an ever increasing role. This essay agrees with this view and will first discuss that the more close countries are, the most positive impact on environmental issues can be achieved, and secondly, it will claim that international trading is easier between brothers nations.
To begin with, as a greater number of countries gather together, there is more likely to curb climate change harms to the earth. This is because as more governments from different regions of the planet join, more money would be available. Therefore, there would be a better infraestructure to curb the global warming and thus the avoidance of weather related issues such as flooding or hurricans. For example, Chile, Argentina and Brasil have successfully prevented flooding in Buenos Aires due to the fact that they had worked together in building a big dam and a huge flood barrier.
On the other hand, there is no doubt that nations that make effective relationships improve trading. The amount of products imported and exported between nations is incredible greater when they became brotherhoods. As a consequence, people are able to obtain a lot of items straightforwardly from another regions on a daily basis. Thus the global market increases in value. To illustrate this, Puerto Rico and Guatemala made a trade contract and nowadays everyone from either nation can enjoy the products from the other one.
To conclude, although in modern times the globe is at risk of serious problems, the gathering between nations is paramount to increase profits in order to prevent catastrophes. On top of that, more countries together can enhance the trading of products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... from another regions on a daily basis. Thus the global market increases in value. T...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1711409396 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79494748672 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604026845638 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9492043959 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.071428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115246185519 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373247808838 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381427358891 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669426021985 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218278488302 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.