As we are facing many problems which affect the whole planet good relationships between different countries are becoming more important than ever before To what extent do you agree or disagree

There are numerous issues that are happening on the planet by considering this the relationship between different nations plays a crutial role than before. I strongly agree that their should be proper relationship better all parts of the world in hard times as no-one knows what happens the next day.
The planet consists of different cultures, traditions and many more differences. By considering the similar factors it is divided into different countries. There can be many troubles to face in economic manner or food crisis in some parts of the world. If there is proper friendship between other nations there is a possibility of receiving help from others. For example, few years ago the state call kerala in India expirienced floods which destroyed half part of the state in that time the government of UAE donated 500 crores which helped them to rebuilt the state.
If we consider the problem of global warming which became the fear of every human being. It cannot be removed just by a single human it requires all the people support on the planet. In this case if every nation helps in exchanging the recycling materials to the countries which have to make new materials then there will be less need of producing new materials. Which intern reduces the harmful gases that are emitted from factories. Thus, protecting the earth.
To conclude, each year we are facing new problems and difficulties which are causing more trouble to entire globe in these times everyone should help each other as a humanity. It is always better to fight together than alone.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than before. I strongly agree that their should be proper relationship better all...
^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
.... There can be many troubles to face in economic manner or food crisis in some parts of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...food crisis in some parts of the world. If there is proper friendship between othe...
^^
Line 2, column 569, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...which helped them to rebuilt the state. If we consider the problem of global warmi...
^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e less need of producing new materials. Which intern reduces the harmful gases that a...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...blems and difficulties which are causing more trouble to entire globe in these ti...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, thus, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92803030303 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53358694087 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7449100326 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9285714286 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21428571429 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218176507508 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066903452156 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479863803042 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123822199947 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202333178899 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.