We are now living in a "throwaway" culture, using things for a short time and then throwing them away instead of fixing. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to?
In modern society, people tend to dispose their old items rather than trying to amend them. This tendency can be attributed to mass production and advertisement, which causes adverse impacts on individuals as well as the environment.
There are two major factors contributing to the “throwaway” culture, those are the massive manufacturing of consumer goods and the advertising industry. First and foremost, due to advances in technology, industries are now able to produce a considerable number of goods in such a short period. Due to the cheap price nature, these kind of products attracts numerous consumers. However, these goods are not of great quality and often used a few times before thrown away. Another factor that gives rise to the trend is the widespread of advertising in modern world. Advertisement can be watched anywhere, they delivers faulty messages and encourages people to purchase things they do not need. For example, ads of the latest released iPhone 13 would imply that owning this new phone would elevate the owner’s self-image and social status, which is not necessarily true in real life, and thus incentivize people to replace their phone with this newer version.
The mentioned issue poses serious threats to not only individuals but also our living environment. Firstly, individuals are susceptible to get into debt if they persist this habit of spending indiscriminately. In fact, these days many young people have trouble planning their expenses wisely an are under the burden of credit card debts. This would eventually cause them depression and anxiety. Furthermore, this culture is also conducive to several environmental problems like soil and water pollution. Throwaway items means discharging more wastage into the environment, most of which is not able to decompose in hundreds of years. What is worse is these can be eaten by animals like sea creatures and stuck inside their bodies, resulting in the deaths of many animals, posing a great threat to the ecosystem.
In conclusion, the throwaway trend which deteriorates our environment and causes debt burden for individuals is attributable to the mass production and advertising.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-21 | Trang Duong | 89 | view |
- One of major issues facing world today is over population What problem arise from this situation What measures can be taken to deal with it 78
- Process Applying for a driving license in the US 84
- Pebbleton Village 20 years ago vs now 73
- UK and Ashby percentages of occupation
- Two road tunnels in an Australia city 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... period. Due to the cheap price nature, these kind of products attracts numerous consumers...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'deliver'
Suggestion: deliver
...rtisement can be watched anywhere, they delivers faulty messages and encourages people t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... trouble planning their expenses wisely an are under the burden of credit card debts. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'items'' or 'item's'?
Suggestion: items'; item's
...ike soil and water pollution. Throwaway items means discharging more wastage into the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 813, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...posing a great threat to the ecosystem. In conclusion, the throwaway trend which...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35465116279 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96335446975 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622093023256 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4211948967 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.352941176 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167671094657 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462491760973 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363117167336 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889990775714 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201721822139 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.