To what extent Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects instead of some specific subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint

Essay topics:

To what extent
Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects, instead of some specific subjects.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?

Universities have always played a significant role in shaping a well-educated society. Considerable part of the population reckons that academic students should learn a comprehensive range of study fields rather than a limited number of disciplines. Although I agree with the positive aspects of learning wide range of subjects, I have reasons to disagree with this perspective.
From one point of view, people should learn a broad spectrum of disciplines in order to obtain a wide outlook. Nowadays to be a professional is not enough to be a great leader. Through broadmindedness multiplied by knowledge ONLY, a person can be a motivational manager enhancing subordinates. Increasing number of programmes in business schools related to culture reaffirms the idea of the importance of lateral thinking. For instance, during the last year all russian business schools established the faculty of art to educate the business community in this field. Thus, I consider that providing a full range of subjects DEMONSTRATES positive features for the students.
From another point of view, students enter University to get a specific specialization which should be the main focus throughout their studying time. They need to concentrate on specific subjects which are relevant to their future career. There is no necessity to be disturbed with something they do not benefit in the long run. Looking for a job after graduation, students’ relevant abilities and knowledge will be crucial factors for success. For example, statistics show that 95% of headhunters pay attention to the professional background only losing sight of hobbies and personal interest. Therefore, Universities should prioritize specific subjects for the curriculum, otherwise irrelevant topics will be an obstacle for the students to apply for the jobs.
To conclude, though we can not deny the benefits of studying a wide variety of areas, I personally believe that the aim of Universities should be in providing specialized knowledge to their pupils which are relevant to their career in the future.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-04-27 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 78 view
2020-04-17 Qudrat2003 56 view
2020-03-22 Shuklaksh 84 view
2020-03-22 Shuklaksh 84 view
2020-02-16 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 67 view
Essays by user SUSANNA PETROSYAN :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ole in shaping a well-educated society. Considerable part of the population reck...
^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee with the positive aspects of learning wide range of subjects, I have reasons t...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m one point of view, people should learn a broad spectrum of disciplines in order...
^^^^
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to obtain a wide outlook. Nowadays to be a professional is not enough to be a gre...
^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...ific specialization which should be the main focus throughout their studying time. They ne...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44720496894 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15534063618 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580745341615 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3459112247 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19733389583 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060431669597 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509139251178 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113718921669 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040712899049 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ole in shaping a well-educated society. Considerable part of the population reck...
^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee with the positive aspects of learning wide range of subjects, I have reasons t...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m one point of view, people should learn a broad spectrum of disciplines in order...
^^^^
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to obtain a wide outlook. Nowadays to be a professional is not enough to be a gre...
^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...ific specialization which should be the main focus throughout their studying time. They ne...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44720496894 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15534063618 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580745341615 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3459112247 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19733389583 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060431669597 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509139251178 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113718921669 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040712899049 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.