When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, the priority of remuneration has been a bone of contention. A prevalent assertion exists that salary, above other factors, is the most recognisable feature of a desirable job. I partially disagree with this belief as a suitable and enjoyable job is more important than a high-paid one.
On the one hand, it is irrefutable that payment is elemental in every job, strongly affecting people’s choice of an occupation, a company, or a position. This perspective is comprehensible as a good income offers employees much better living conditions, by providing a multitude of choices, thereby enabling them to live where they want, fulfill their needs, and indulge in their interests unhindered. Furthermore, high pay provides people with financial security when they retire, acting as insurance against diseases and many other burdens. Consequently, people lead a free and secured life if they are well-paid.
On the other hand, notwithstanding salary’s merits, I believe that job satisfaction should be the ultimate criterion when finding a job. It is evident that the more fondness people place on their jobs, the higher their performance will be. In other words, workers with enthusiasm and dedication are more likely to yield fruitful results, generating a successful career. Moreover, earnings will engender negative effects if placed too much emphasis on. For instance, people who obsess about monetary gain often have a tendency to work extra hours while abandoning other facets regarding satisfaction, health, social relationships, etc. Inevitably, they will suffer stress and depression as a result of long-term overworking.
In closing, deeming work pay’s crucial role, I agree that it is a prominent part of a job. Meanwhile, workers should focus on their own feelings when taking a job, as occupational pleasure will take them further in their career path than income will.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-06 | Manideep Macherla | 89 | view |
- In the past sports champions used to be motivated by the desire to win a match or to break world records These days they are more likely to be motivated by prize money and the opportunity to be famous What message does this send to young people and how do 89
- In the past sports champions used to be motivated by the desire to win a match or to break world records These days they are more likely to be motivated by prize money and the opportunity to be famous What message does this send to young people and how do 89
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In the past sports champions used to be motivated by the desire to win a match or to break world records These days they are more likely to be motivated by prize money and the opportunity to be famous What message does this send to young people and how do 89
- The chart below gives information about the growth of the urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43624161074 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.049743004 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664429530201 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9788098257 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124167688789 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399377095758 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051891367108 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080601153757 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397910429238 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.