Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an idea that someone’s success mostly depends on luck instead of their hard work. However, I completely disagree with this opinion.
I believe that only determined and industrious people can attain their goals and become successful in whatever they do. For instance, Thomas Edison had spent thousands of hours working on the light bulb. After all, he successfully created the electric light which now is super prevalent in humans’ daily life. Another clear case of success through hard work is Nick Vujicic. Although he has been suffered from a rare disease and has neither hands nor legs, he still earned a bachelor’s degree; then he traveled around the world and become a motivational speaker who inspired disabled people.
Another aspect that supports my argument is that success does not depend on luck. Firstly, the presence of luck in our life is very occasional. If a person wins a lottery, they are more likely to rely on the money instead of being hard-working. However, he or she cannot win the lottery for the rest of his or her life. Another reason is that if we totally trust in luck, we will receive disappointment. For example, in the 2021 Graduation Exam in Vietnam, many students have suspected the Literature’s topic is paragraphs, but the actual exam is about a poem. As a result, various test takers do not get above 5 in their test because of their reliance on luckiness.
In conclusion, although luck is a positive signal, people should not always rely on it. Because luck is not the main factor contributing to the success of individuals. Equally important, the frequency that luck is present in our daily life is very slim. Therefore, people need to try their best to reach the achievement that they want.
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot depend on luck. Firstly, the presence of luck in our life is very occasional. ...
^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l, people should not always rely on it. Because luck is not the main factor contributin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...ributing to the success of individuals. Equally important, the frequency that luck is p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90572390572 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72483159653 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632996632997 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7439799795 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9444444444 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147800472283 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455576595752 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497605125127 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106496047491 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600716082118 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.