Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that luck mainly makes a contribution to the success of some people, rather than hard work. Personally, I disagree with this opinion for a number of reasons.
On the one hand, hard work plays a crucial role in people‘s achievement. To obtain a goal, people usually have to develop a plan and then devote their money, time and effort to their own projects. With thorough preparation during an appropriate period of time, they are likely to reach their determined target. For example, to become a doctor, students may have to dig deep into complicated issues of medicine and then undertake years of training. Without attempt and commitment, they might not accomplish their dream.
On the other hand, luck is just a miniature factor in determining one’s accomplishment . In fact, luck is a determinant that no one can manipulate completely so that it is extremely risky to depend too much on it. People who gamble their success solely on luck tend to end up being disappointed if what they await does not happen. The worst case is that they might fail in fulfilling their ambition. For example, there are a lot of students who always hope to be lucky to stumble upon some questions that they have studied carefully. They also tend to underestimate the process of preparation and training. As a result, they might not have the ability to solve an unexpected problem and then get bad marks in the exam.
In conclusion, I hold the view that luck is not of paramount importance in every success. Instead, industrious and well-prepared people have a high probability to attain their objectives in their life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Khaihoang | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | coolR | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | bennguyen95 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | minh huyen | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-10 | subashtimalsina112 | 67 | view |
- These day it seems that an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in the city. Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation and suggest some ways on which this trend could be reversed. 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 73
- Topic: Fast food is now universally in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that this is a positive trend while others not.What is your opinion on this? 73
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources Do you agree or disagree 92
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rough preparation during an appropriate period of time, they are likely to reach their determi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...in determining one's accomplishment . In fact, luck is a determinant that no ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92028985507 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86200770707 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.456658836 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.875 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123909466256 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405046730446 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293743616684 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778841845307 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147484553378 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.