Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While some people think that they have to be lucky to achieve their objectives, I totally disagree with this.
On the one hand, obviously most of people have to work very hard to get the success. Steven Jobs, for instance, he is one of the billionaire in the world. He is a very hard-working person and always efforts as much as possible through his life. As a result, he made Apple a huge success. Another example is Nick Vuijicic who is very famous person. Despite of his disabilities, he has studied very hard to gain degrees and travels around the world to inspire for other people.
On the other hand, success does not depend on luck. Firstly, students who hope to be lucky in the exams and do not study will probably fail. Many students now are very lazy, they do not prepare for the exam or they just study some topics they think it will appear in the exam. Consequently, they get a low mark, even fail the very important test. It is very regret. Secondly, people may be lucky occasionally, but if they rely on luck throughout their lives will almost certainly be disappointed. Many investors getting many profits when invest for certain project thanks to the luck. However, it is not always lucky like that. To be the success investors, they have to study market, observe the market trends and predict the success ability of project.
In conclusion, success does not comes to the people who just wait for the luck, it is the result of the hard working and efforts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Khaihoang | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | coolR | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | bennguyen95 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | minh huyen | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-10 | subashtimalsina112 | 67 | view |
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasing wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solution? 56
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...with this. On the one hand, obviously most of people have to work very hard to get the succe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'come'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: come
...oject. In conclusion, success does not comes to the people who just wait for the luc...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'come'
Suggestion: come
...oject. In conclusion, success does not comes to the people who just wait for the luc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59848484848 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41112692695 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55303030303 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1117839228 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.4117647059 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0764530879862 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025053979478 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322971425695 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572128172911 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382809700094 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.0946893788 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 12.4159519038 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.