Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of
resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion saying that protecting wild animals is a waste of
time and effort since they are not necessary anymore in the 21st
century. I disagree with this statement for the reasons outlined
below.
It is nonsense to say wild animals have no part in the 21st century since
they always play an important role in the environment. Whether in the
Stone Age, medieval age or modern age, animals, and plants have been
living together and forming a balance in life that no humans can make.
Plants give off oxygen and food, while animals help plants grow and
multiply. If we don’t protect wild animals well, most of them will go
extinct due to overhunting, which will break the balance of nature and
lead to many adverse consequences of deforestation, hurricane, and
other terrible disasters.
It takes resources to protect wild animals, but their existence will bring
other benefits to the nations that preserve/conserve them. Wildlife,
zoos and preservation/conservation areas that allow tourists to visit
would generate a large amount of income each year to the countries
in charge, while they can even take pride in themselves for having some
of the rarest wild animals in the world, not to mention the environment
protection along with it. In addition, most of the cost for protecting the
wild animals are covered by various international funds all over the world,
so having rare species is more of a blessing than a burden to a
country.
In conclusion, wild animals deserve to live freely under the protection of
humans due to the significance/importance of their existence and the
benefits they are bringing. We should do everything we can to protect
them for the sake of ourselves and our future generations
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | ielts_tony | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
- Rich countries are getting richer while poor countries are getting poorer What is cause of this what could be done to solve tis problem 67
- Today family members do not eat meals together Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- Some people say that econnomic growth is only way to end world poverty and hunger Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop Discuss both views and give your own opinion 80
- art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate turn their focus on science technology and business Why do you think that is What could be done to encourage people to take inter 78
- A poor infrastructure hinders under developed countries from progress and modernizing Some people think that this should be the first problem tackled by foreign aid To what extent do you agree with this opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12456747405 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09082742348 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581314878893 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.9519315478 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.636363636 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.38176352705 571% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299532395423 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10687063003 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536408649865 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698881092969 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744223684262 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.