Wild animals have no place in 21st century. Some people think that preventing these animals from dying out is a waste of resource. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion
It is true that these days many people harbor a concern that spending money on protecting wild animals is a waste. I completely disagree with this pointless view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that animals do not have a place in the 21st century. Firstable, I do not believe that Earth's existence is only for the benefits of human life, hence, there is nothing special in the human right that enables people to become listless for the extinction of animals. Moreover, there is no reason why we should encourage or allow the animals death. We do not need to exploit or destroy any last metre of land in order to accommodate or feed the world's population. There are plenty of ways that we can live a peaceful life with the animals.
Not only I disagree with the standpoint that the money spent on the protection of wild animals is a waste of resources, but also natural resources, especially wild animals, are a pivotal part of human life. From the prehistoric times, people used animal meats as the primary source of food, as a result, human life can be in danger by the lack of protein provided by meat. Furthermore, encouraging the danger of animals and their natural habitats can badly affect human existence. For instance, in the beginning of 2020, there is a huge wildfire in Amazon, which is known as the lungs of the world, which produce a paramount of oxygen on an annual basis, also adsorb the carbon dioxide, and stabilise the Earth's climate. Consequently, the costs of managing the resulting changes of this wildfire by far outweigh the costs of conservation. Finally, protecting wild animals and their habitats is a way to maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything to protect the wild animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-04 | Hoangquan0912 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that robot technology is very important for our future Some others believe that robots are dangerous invention and have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give opinion 78
- Some people think that young people should follow the traditions of their society There however believe that young people should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- the paragraph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 78
- Wild animals have no place in 21st century Some people think that preventing these animals from dying out is a waste of resource To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...on why we should encourage or allow the animals death. We do not need to exploit or des...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...and in order to accommodate or feed the worlds population. There are plenty of ways th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not animals should exist, and I believe tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71604938272 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61871757848 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515432098765 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.220073096 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257088485515 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928519544651 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695388434739 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165029141176 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279847719299 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.