It is better to eat food which is produced locally by small farmers, rather than food produced by ‘factory farming’ and transported long distances.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is a big dilemma to choose between locally produced food and factory farming, whereas factory farming which became more popular threatens not only the way we eat but also the way we live, our traditions, and what we consume.
Factory farming became a huge industry threatening diversity of food and local culture. Consuming locally produced food by small farmers, supports also local producing and enhances local economy. Since global farming companies are aiming for maximizing their profits, they try to integrate new methods in producing process which disturbs the traditional farming methods. Those methods are experiences gained and preserved by farmers in centuries which give the food its local taste.
As a second aspect of this, the variation of food is affected also in a biological manner, for example instead of eating locally produced tomato with a local seed, you eat a tomato which’s seed came from Israel or China which is more durable to diseases, cold or sun. This kills local seeds and in long run the fauna of local regions. All the farmed food became same taste, same shape, smells same.
Finally food industry which is spreading and became powerful all around the world, also threatens local small farming companies, which is important for local jobs. Since young people cannot find in the local areas they tend to move to big cities where they also lose their local traditions, and habits and get closer to became singular, demand and consume same food, drink, clothes etc.. this in turn supplies this vicious cycle of big factory farming.
To sum up, although factory farming became a huge industry, in a wide aspect, it also changes our production methods, consuming habits, and where and how we live, which in turn will going to alter all the local cultures gained in ages and endangers them to extinct.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., our traditions, and what we consume. Factory farming became a huge industry t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a biological manner" with adverb for "biological"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the variation of food is affected also in a biological manner, for example instead of eating locally...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...also in a biological manner, for example instead of eating locally produced tomat...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ame taste, same shape, smells same. Finally food industry which is spreading and be...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...nd consume same food, drink, clothes etc.. this in turn supplies this vicious cycl...
^^
Line 7, column 389, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...consume same food, drink, clothes etc.. this in turn supplies this vicious cycle of ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 183, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...ere and how we live, which in turn will going to alter all the local cultures gained ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, second, so, whereas, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04575163399 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38046717013 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552287581699 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.197614063 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335959053066 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136951550926 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689926507115 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191454652898 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802778237394 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.