This line graph shows car theft incidents from 1990 to 1999 in four countries per thousand. Overall, we can see that car thefts are much higher in Britain compared to the other countries.
The Car thefts in Great Britain were around 18 per thousand in 1990, where it started to increase until 1992. There is a slight decrease in 1992 for one year where it started again and made its peak in 1996 around 20 theft incidents. From that point there is a steady decrease to 18 again.
On the other hand, car thefts, in France and Canada followed quite a similar trend. In both countries the thefts were around 9 in 1990 and begun to decline for three years to a number of 6 per thousand. From this point the thefts in Canada increased steady but slightly for 6 years and ended with 7 thefts per thousand, whereas the thefts in France showed a more fluctuating trend but also ended around 7.
Finally the car thefts in Sweden showed a consistent increase in throughout the whole timescale, started from 8 per thousand and ended 14 per thousand except for 2 years from 1996 to 1998 where it stayed steady around 10 per thousand
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 97
- The water use in 2000 by six countries in the Middle East 51
- The chart below shows the proportions of the world s oil resources held in different areas together with the proportions consumed annually in the same areas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 66
- The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... both countries the thefts were around 9 in 1990 and begun to decline for three y...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ting trend but also ended around 7. Finally the car thefts in Sweden showed a consi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, so, whereas, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54901960784 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28477652469 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524509803922 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3486685925 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248663703043 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128902947157 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671108806105 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187183316777 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651375081741 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.