Write about the following topic:
The large number of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming. Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation systems in order to help solve this problem. Others think it is better to spend money for the development of electric and other types of cars that may cause.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your
answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and
experience.
Global warming is the biggest issue in this century, government and citizens need to be concern with his problem. Global warming is one of the effects of transportation pollution. Former automobile produces carbon dioxide and it can cause polution. To reduce this issue some citizen propose an idea for government to spend errand and build public transportation and the other side belive the change the car to reweinable ones. I sure both of these ideas are the best way to reduce the pollution.
70 percent of society still have their own car for their mobility. I sure if government spend a lot of money to develop public transportation, meanwhile citizen still have private transportation, the would not use the public transportation. So, one of the government need to do just like Singapore, they give high rate of automobile tax if household still want to have and use their car. By creating this regulation, I believe it would decrease 50 percent of owned cars in the country.
Another idea could become consideration, there is developing electric technology especially in automobile industry. This option can reduce the pollution from car and it needs specific human resource for help government to mantain it. On the other hand, citizen needs to buy new car to reduce pollution issue. I think, buying new car is a big deal for society, they need to spend amount of money and when most of them do not want to change their car. So, it still can be a problem for government if their only use this idea.
To sum up, it is better to combine both of them issues by giving high taxes to reduce the population of cars, so they can use public transportation. Along with maintaining the development of electric car. In the future public transportation can also use the newest technology.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, while, i think, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8954248366 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87871400428 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506535947712 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4176466199 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1176470588 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82352941176 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148602825518 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504170487047 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417107906973 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908267070587 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497118257287 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.