Write about the following topic:
The large number of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming. Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation systems in order to help solve this problem. Others think it is better to spend money for the development of electric and other types of cars that may cause.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your
answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and
experience.
Global warming is the biggest issue in this century, government and citizens need to be concern with his problem. Global warming is one of the effects of transportation pollution. Former automobile produces carbon dioxide and it can cause pollution. To reduce this issue some citizen propose an idea for government to spend errand and build public transportation and the other side belive the change the car to renewable ones. I sure both of these ideas are the best way to reduce the pollution.
Building public transportation needs a lot of money and government needs to consider is society wants to use it for the future ride?. Based on my own experienced, 70 percent household from my hometown have own car, whereas it used for time efficiency and mobility. It should be noted that changing lifestyle is not an easy task, government need to pay attention for it. I think by giving high taxes for purchasing and owning automobile can be the solution for society to change their habit. Like in Singapore, public prefers to use public transportation comparing driving by their own.
Meanwhile, there is another idea should be one of the consideration. In spite of changing the habit, government can build and develop electric car. Even though this technology can sepend a lot of money for researching and need specific companies to make it. Meanwhile, individuals can still use their owned transportation. I admit this easily can change the habiit of people from using carbon dioxide car to rewinable car.
To sum up, both concepts are the best, but it needs some time to change the habit of society to use public transportation. Instead of changing that habit, government can sell electric car and give several facilities for the development of renewable energy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, whereas, while, i think, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06462585034 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87966503778 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6170678591 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5882352941 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137137000692 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485853413474 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334208258262 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897028163484 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012644062429 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.