Global warming is the biggest issue in this century, government and citizens need to be a concern with his problem. Global warming is one of the effects of transportation pollution. A former automobile produces carbon dioxide and it can cause pollution. To reduce this issue some citizen proposes an idea for government to spend errand and build public transportation and the other side believe the change the car to renewable ones. I sure both of these ideas are the best way to reduce pollution.
Building public transportation needs a lot of money and the government needs to consider is does society wants to use it for their future ride. Based on my own experienced, 70 percent household from my hometown have own car, whereas it used for time efficiency and mobility. It should be noted that changing lifestyle is not an easy task, the government needs to pay attention to it. I think by giving high taxes for purchasing and owning an automobile can be the solution for society to change their habit. Like in Singapore, the public prefers to use public transportation comparing driving on their own.
Meanwhile, there is another idea should be one of the consideration. In spite of changing the habit, the government can build and develop an electric car. Even though this technology can spend a lot of money on researching and need specific companies to make it. Meanwhile, individuals can still use their owned transportation. I admit this easily can change the habit of people from using carbon dioxide car to renewable car.
To sum up, both concepts are the best, but it needs some time to change the habit of society to use public transportation. Instead of changing public habit, the government can sell an electric car and give several facilities for the development of renewable energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'want'?
Suggestion: want
...nment needs to consider is does society wants to use it for their future ride. Based ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, whereas, while, i think, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96052631579 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88015916717 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496710526316 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0634103572 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7058823529 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128582065061 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462535381869 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318612271901 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857964256187 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134517976364 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.