We are now facing the pressing problem that millions of forests have been destroyed in recent years. Forests, namely the green lungs of the Earth, have their vital role, so I agree that deforestation threatens our lives.
The value of forests cannot be underestimated literally. As we know, human being cannot live without respiratory systems. So does the Earth. Thousands of green trees play the role of lungs absorbing CO2 and releasing O2. Moreover, forests are homes of wildlife and many genres of birds representing the biodiversity of our planet. Natural habitats are also the land growing several herbs, which bring for human precious traditional medicine.
Destruction of the forests comprises of several activities such as illegal and sustainable logging, hunting, forest fires, etc,… due to the rising demand for wood, fuel and land for farming. Commercial agriculture is the largest driver of deforestation. Imagine if we lose our lung of the Earth, it will produce significant greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, the ecosystem might be not as various as it was being before since the habitats of many species gradually decline. Lastly, unstainable logging causes erosion dramatically as well, which leads to natural disasters called floods. We will observe a prospect of movements of people to other places within the countries or across national borders.
In conclusion, forests seem to be organs of our bodies, so if they hurt, our bodies will respond straight away. Local authorities should address this problem as soon as possible by preventing illegal deforestation and raising awareness of local people about the value of our green lungs of the Earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...l medicine. Destruction of the forests comprises of several activities such as illegal and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...able logging, hunting, forest fires, etc,… due to the rising demand for wood, fuel...
^^
Line 3, column 706, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e countries or across national borders. In conclusion, forests seem to be organs...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33962264151 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83284403736 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0188911991 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4375 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168738149157 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488967149111 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359040503221 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101129646179 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00310047180608 0.056905535591 5% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.