Young people learn good behavior more from movies and books than real-life experiences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that movies and books play a more crucial role than hands-on experiences in shaping the youth’s behavior. I disagree with this notion as I believe the role models portrayed in books and movies are not always suitable and that real-life experiences are more influential on people's mind.
To commence, some films and books can have a negative impact on one’s ideology, more particularly on that of children. While some books and movies are educational and can teach youngsters to be better, some fiction ones have exaggerated villains as the main characters. When consumed mindlessly, they can lead to improper behaviors. Take the movie “Joker” for example, despite being a criminal with morally wrong actions, the main character, Joker, is looked up to by many young audiences and is even considered a hero by some. As a result, many try to imitate his behaviors without realizing the possible dire consequences.
Secondly, practical experiences are undoubtedly more likely to be engraved in one's mind. To elaborate, people can learn more from experiences as they can remember them and the lessons they have learned more vividly. If one behaves badly and is criticized by others, one will realize what one did is wrong and affects others, thus learning not to make the same mistakes in the future. While bullying has always been taught in schools and books, bullies do not change their behavior unless their teachers and parents punish them.
In conclusion, I disagree with the opinion that books and movies teach young people good behavior better than practical experiences. Learning through experiences is more effective in shaping young people's behavior and attitudes because the lessons acquired are direct, better stored, and more suitable for each individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | thuthao2000 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | quan12341234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | thuthao2000 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | tieuquynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-23 | trinhthanh1 | 61 | view |
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic The personal information of many individuals is held by large internet companies and organizations Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 89
- What are the causes and solutions to higher rates of obesity among children in some countries 89
- Some people think that poverty is the reason behind most crimes To what extent do you agree 84
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic The personal information of many individuals is held by large internet companies and organizations Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun try seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tries'.
Suggestion: many tries
...considered a hero by some. As a result, many try to imitate his behaviors without realiz...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...doubtedly more likely to be engraved in ones mind. To elaborate, people can learn mo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26132404181 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72300487536 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9434425286 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.153846154 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37280527967 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123843449501 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100936742439 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238538475028 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111004068381 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.