All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them?
Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that all vehicles that use non-renewable sources of energy like fossil fuels should be banned and cars that run on battery should take their place. I completely agree with the above notion because fossil fuels are limited and secondly such fuels have a devastating effect on the environment.
To embark with, undoubtedly Fossil Fuels like coal, oil and natural gas were formed over millions of years from decayed plants and animals by their exposure to heat and pressure in the earth's crust. Such fuels cannot be manufactured again and there is dire need to retain them for future generations to come. We all know that fossil fuels contain various other energy sources like petroleum, coal and natural gas. However, prohibiting vehicles to use them can make a big difference and in this way, it can be retained for generations to come. For e.g. Tesla introduced its first electric car in 2007 keeping in mind the global challenge to preserve these limited fuels.
On the other hand, fossil fuels are not environment-friendly as its use produces harmful greenhouse gases in the form of carbon monoxide which is very harmful to humanity as well as aquatic life. Moreover, its use has also affected air quality in major cities like Beijing, Delhi as well as it is the main reason behind the depletion of the ozone layer. For e.g. in 2018, China banned the use of vehicles in the city of Guangzhou due to the adverse effects of pollution on the environment and visibility.
In conclusion, I support the necessity to ban fossil fuels and replace them with battery running cars. In this way, we can retain good amount of fuels for future offsprings and at the same time, we are helping our mother nature to provide us with a healthy environment and high-quality atmosphere to breathe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-08 | Karan.gulati07 | 73 | view |
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas, in the past, people used to repair damaged things and keep them for a long time.Explain why you think this change has happened. What are the effects of this change in attitude? 61
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them?Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Last month you had an overseas holiday with some friends where you stayed at their house. They have just sent you some holiday photos.Write a letter to your friends.In your letter:1.Thank them for the holiday and the photos.2.Explain why you didn’t writ 73
- Many processed foods and ready made meals contain preservatives and chemicals What are the advantages of this Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 81
- The crime rate, in most countries, is often higher in urban areas than in rural areas.Why do you think that is?What can be done to reduce the crime rate? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, e.g., first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89576547231 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6597801597 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57328990228 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.9629764497 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259126544967 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942663323545 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896190388051 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16094320281 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109433928352 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.