Irrefutably in the modern scenario, it is common the energy source significant in phonemeon. Although, natural energy sources such as wind waves and sun, yet it is more expensive as well as complicated to utilize coal has and oil, who use to power their cities and transportation. I agree with this notion and I will explain some views in the upcoming paragraphs.
Commencing with the abundant of benefits natural source who use in human beings day to day lives. The cardinal point to be considered is that millions of indicia lot of utilisation at home and for transportation in existing time. Although, the trend of the natural power of more worthwhile, yet we can ignore the effects of this trend. Since not only it is crucial for human, but also affair about the demolish in the phenomenon in the future life.
Furthermore, it is considered the people can not ignore of the positive facilities for them. The provoking factor behind it is that it is no denying the fact people have more significance in today time. However, nowadays it more utilised by population compare to the past decade. The more development of the energy source and the more opportunities. For instance, it can be observed that individual more utilizing transportation vichle for visit outside, yet in past year masses do not use it. Ergo, it can neglect the benefits at movement time.
To conclude, I pen down saying that natural source tremendously meaningful for human beings. Although, natural source using rose in day to day life by population it has a plethora of cause, which can face future lives.
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility while others believe that tourists should not accept any responsibility at all To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Alternative sources that use the natural power of wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say that art subjects such as music drama and creative writing are an essential part of education and every school should include them in its syllabus Do you agree or disagree with this statement 79
- Alternative sources that use the natural power of wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people claim that there are more disadvantages of the car than its advantages Do you agree or disagree Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a car 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...icated to utilize coal has and oil, who use to power their cities and transportatio...
^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...enefits natural source who use in human beings day to day lives. The cardinal point to...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rucial for human, but also affair about the demolish in the phenomenon in the future life. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: OF_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of course' (=naturally)?
Suggestion: of course
...ay life by population it has a plethora of cause, which can face future lives.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91078066914 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85666386918 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0961056828 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210115417515 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628298406113 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919695430929 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140976370722 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899539405796 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.