Alternative sources that use the natural power of wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree

Irrefutably in the modern scenario, it is common the energy source significant in phonemeon. Although, natural energy sources such as wind waves and sun, yet it is more expensive as well as complicated to utilize coal has and oil, who use to power their cities and transportation. I agree with this notion and I will explain some views in the upcoming paragraphs.

Commencing with the abundant of benefits natural source who use in human beings day to day lives. The cardinal point to be considered is that millions of indicia lot of utilisation at home and for transportation in existing time. Although, the trend of the natural power of more worthwhile, yet we can ignore the effects of this trend. Since not only it is crucial for human, but also affair about the demolish in the phenomenon in the future life.

Furthermore, it is considered the people can not ignore of the positive facilities for them. The provoking factor behind it is that it is no denying the fact people have more significance in today time. However, nowadays it more utilised by population compare to the past decade. The more development of the energy source and the more opportunities. For instance, it can be observed that individual more utilizing transportation vichle for visit outside, yet in past year masses do not use it.

In conclusion, there is little doubt that we will soon need to wean ourselves off fossil fuels and on to an alternative fuel source. The only real question is whether we risk the costs and delays of green energy or choose the productive, but potentially dangerous, nuclear option.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...icated to utilize coal has and oil, who use to power their cities and transportatio...
^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...enefits natural source who use in human beings day to day lives. The cardinal point to...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rucial for human, but also affair about the demolish in the phenomenon in the future life. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90405904059 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86515623417 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575645756458 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2791904483 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9285714286 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213949505583 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612878791936 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940316616604 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127006090086 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980731171612 0.056905535591 172% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.