Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It goes without saying nothing the childhood is the golden period of each and every individual. Children are the tender buds who can be moulded in any form. In my opinion, it is quite true to a high extent.

To begin with there are multifarious reasons behind why poor children are well boast up instead of affluent children. First of all, the youngsters who grew up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life then infancy’s who are brought up by wealthy parents due to independent and responsibilities there by they are always ready for every task in their life by which they also get trained in every problem that how to solve every issue easily. However, they have responsibility of their parents how to do every work in well state. Poor children’s also do not have high demands from their backbones.

Additionally, the children belongs to rich families are very high demanding with lot of expensive commodities hence they are also careless. They generally always afraid from difficult situations in there life. Apart from this these type of teens do not focus on there responsibilities due to their richness of there families. Furthermore, they do not do hard work so, they mostly faces problems in there daily life. Where as the children’s which are brought rich families mostly these youngsters eat lot of junk foods in there daily routine as a consequence, they get suffers from plethora of ailments as compare to poor child’s. I would like to cite an example a children from Algeria which knows ten type of languages owing of there knowledge and hard work.

To recapitulate, it can be retreated that undoubtedly the poor infancy’s are more prepared an adult life as compare to wealthy youngsters due to there diligence and responsibility in this contemporary scenario

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS General Training

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'boasted'.
Suggestion: boasted
...asons behind why poor children are well boast up instead of affluent children. First ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'face'
Suggestion: face
...hey do not do hard work so, they mostly faces problems in there daily life. Where as ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...tly faces problems in there daily life. Where as the children's which are brought r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 673, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: a child; children
...apos;s. I would like to cite an example a children from Algeria which knows ten type of la...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, well, apart from, first of all, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00647249191 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97545317611 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511326860841 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.9263525543 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309386429101 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926889436955 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828528167309 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16545025357 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103773507012 0.056905535591 182% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.