Countries should spend more money on trains rather than new roads .Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays,It is always debated whether more money should be spent on trains and not on new roads. This essay agrees with this statement because trains are faster and are environmental friendly.
Trains are Faster and do have certain merits compared with the Road Transport System, They do not have high traffic and have higher maximum speed. The higher maximum speed of the train helps in reduced Journey times, Besides that people do not get tired easily. Unlike on road vehicles, Trains are less prone to accidents. As a matter of fact, Due to very limited traffic on railway tracks, Trains keep up more standard timings as per the Schedule without delay. A research study found that the Passengers saved an average of 45 minutes per day when travelling through San Francisco BART System when compared with the passengers who traveled by car in San Francisco Metro area.
It is a well-known fact that the Trains are more environmental friendly as they do not produce much carbon dioxide and other toxic gases . Increase in the number of trains reduces the number of cars on the road, which certainly reduces the emissions of carbon dioxide. The Fall in the emissions of Toxic gases reduces the global warming, Besides that It is very good to Passengers as they tend to suffer less from respiratory diseases. For instance, The Carbon dioxide percentage in the air went down by 10 percentage in china after spending more money on trains and not new roads.
To Conclude, More money should be spent towards trains than new roads because they are faster, reliable and are environmental friendly. Trains are also recommended because of reduced travel time and less delays.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Ekjot Singh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | malveer | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Harrynguyen1980 | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Jaydev Patel | 73 | view |
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Countries should spend more money on trains rather than new roads .Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Countries should spend more money on trains rather than new roads .Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people say that the Olympic Games no longer have a role to play in the 21st century. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Prevention is better than cure.Researching and treating diseases are too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , It
Nowadays,It is always debated whether more money sh...
^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...uch carbon dioxide and other toxic gases . Increase in the number of trains reduce...
^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun delays is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...nded because of reduced travel time and less delays.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, well, for instance, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97153024911 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46422264412 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540925266904 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6850429026 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.461538462 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290407141209 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106921618851 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818271836111 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190906270628 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046333125431 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.